Jul 29 2008

Automated Article Generation and Spamming Google Knol

Tag: Criticisms of Knol, Knol and SEOadmin @ 8:02 pm

Over at Mashable, Mark has written an article pointing out that, only three days after Knol’s release, nefarious SEO types are experimenting with ways to spam Knol:

The time for speculation as to when this will occur, though, is past. A while back I somehow got subscribed to a list belonging to a maker of splog automation software by the name of Peter Drew. He’s since moved to the semi-legitimate world of automated article creation software, but relies on very suspect methods of revenue, affiliate marketing and SEO generation to promote his software.

This morning I received the URGENT ALERT that a mere three days after the launch of Google’s Knol, he’s already created an automated Knol article generator.

I’m not sure that ‘automated article creation’ qualifies even as ’semi-legitimate’. Nonetheless, Mr. Drew has developed a piece of software colourfully named the Badass Google Knol Dominator. Here’s an introductory video:

It’s basically an automatic article submitter. Which, on the surface, doesn’t seem that problematic. However, as Mark from Mashable points out:

As you can tell, the purpose of this software isn’t to create valuable “Knol units” or to spread the altruistic dream of free knowledge for all, but to create Knols with the purpose to squat on as much namespace as possible while attempting to reap the rewards of high value links from the Google domain these articles will sit on.

Obviously spam is going to be a huge problem for Google Knol to deal with. I note, for example, that the first Knol on Digg that I found is copied verbatim from the Wikipedia article on the same topic.

I don’t know much about anti-spam tactics, but I assume there are some pretty simple strategies to block tools like Mr. Drew’s. Captchas would probably be effective, as would some kind of restriction on the number of submissions per hour.

People are going to try to game Knol just as they try to game every other money or link generating site on the web. It’s just the latest chapter in an arms race between companies and the parasitical strategies people employ to exploit them. Google has lots of experience to bring to bear on the problem, so I expect they’ll do a decent (though imperfect) job of separating the wheat from the chafe.


Jul 23 2008

Oddly, Digg Eschews News of Google Knol Launch

Tag: Knol Buzzadmin @ 10:34 pm

I was compiling and sifting through reaction to the Knol launch from around the web, and noticed something weird. I searched Digg.com for front page stories about ‘knol’. No joy–the newest is 189 days old. It’s the same deal for stories involving Google–nothing on the Knol launch there.

It struck me as odd, that the tech news giant was, for all intents and purposes, ignoring the launch of Google Knol. There were a couple of submissions at around 60 to 65 Diggs, but not enough to hit the notorious front page.

Then I figured it out. I feel a little silly, actually, because I noticed this news earlier in the day:

Digg - Google In Negotiations To Acquire Digg For “Around $200M"

3900 Diggs and counting. That’s big news in that community. There’s even a supplementary story that’s received over 2500 Diggs.

Of course, it’s not like there’s a click-scarcity on Digg. Diggers could push both Google-related stories to the front page, but for whatever reason, the, uh, sourced-crowd chose not too favour Knol. Maybe tomorrow?

UPDATE: Today, Digg finally pushed a knol story to the front page. Oddly, it’s from PhysOrg.com.